Twitch Shares Bad News for Both Big and Small Streamers
In our latest blog post, we tackle a topic that’s been at the forefront of the community for some time – the rev split.
We also provide a related update around monetization for a subset of Partners.
Read here: https://t.co/zP6xcCtJAQ pic.twitter.com/KAwOMDIkmm
— Twitch (@Twitch) September 21, 2022
The letter to some extent locations, and declines, a famous UserVoice post kicked off in 2020 with more than 22,000 votes requesting 70/30 to be the new ordinary. For those not right now taking part in that frame of mind of premium arrangement, the letter attempts to answer why it will not be going to a 70/30 membership income share split to some extent by proposing that there are more ways for Twitch streamers to bring in cash than at any other time. It proceeds to guarantee that the expense of Twitch offering the support is high.
“Conveying superior quality, low dormancy, consistently accessible live video to virtually every side of the world is costly,” states Clancy. “Utilizing the distributed rates from Amazon Web Administrations’ Intuitive Video Administration (IVS) — which is basically Twitch video — live video costs for a 100 CCU decoration who streams 200 hours a month are more than $1000 each month. We don’t ordinarily discuss this in light of the fact that, honestly, you shouldn’t need to consider it. We’d prefer you center around doing what you excel at. In any case, to completely respond to the subject of ‘why not 70/30,’ overlooking the significant expense of conveying the Twitch administration would have implied offering you a deficient response.”
